Skip to content
Color scheme: Dark.
PROGRAM · SPACE D

Perspective Modeling & Cognitive Reconstruction

EIL investigates whether artificial intelligence can serve as a structured instrument for reconstructing how another person may perceive, interpret and reason about a situation.

Exploratoryin preparation

What is reconstructed from

The work draws on what is externally available and builds plausible internal models from it. Every model stays a reconstruction from evidence and carries its status on every statement.

What is reconstructed from

The material is externally available traces:

  • language
  • decisions
  • behavioral patterns
  • contradictions
  • omissions
  • recurring reactions
  • priorities
  • interpersonal dynamics
  • contextual information
  • temporal changes in behavior

The central question

How far can a human-AI system reconstruct another person's likely internal model without confusing interpretation with observation?

What is reconstructed

Personality profiling assigns traits and labels. Cognitive reconstruction builds a dynamic model of what a person appears to know at a given time and how they read the situation. The model records:

What is reconstructed

  • what information the person appears to possess
  • what they may believe
  • which assumptions their behavior appears to depend on
  • how they interpret other actors
  • which goals or constraints could explain their actions
  • which alternatives they appear to consider
  • where contradictions exist
  • how their model of the situation changes over time

A possible analytical structure

  1. OBSERVED BEHAVIOR
  2. LANGUAGE / ACTION / CONTEXTLanguage, action, context
  3. PATTERN RECONSTRUCTION
  4. POSSIBLE BELIEFS & ASSUMPTIONSPossible beliefs and assumptions
  5. COMPETING MENTAL-MODEL HYPOTHESES
  6. CONSISTENCY / CONTRADICTION TESTINGTesting for consistency and contradiction
  7. UPDATED MODEL

new observation back to stage 1

AI as a cognitive reconstruction instrument

The human-AI system itself is part of the methodology.

AI as a cognitive reconstruction instrument

Large language models can support this process because they can compare at the same time:

  • large quantities of conversational evidence
  • temporal sequences
  • alternative interpretations
  • social context
  • semantic inconsistencies
  • counterfactual explanations

The AI works as an external inference engine next to the researcher. Its contribution is comparison and stress-testing. The view into the mind of the person studied stays out of reach.

Perspective Modeling

What would the situation have to look like from this person's perspective for this behavior to become coherent?

Perspective Modeling

Besides asking "What did this person do?", EIL can ask a second question:

This allows reconstruction of:

  • possible information states
  • expectations
  • perceived threats
  • incentives
  • social interpretations
  • decision frames
  • causal assumptions

The method moves between several levels:

  1. PERSPECTIVE
  2. MENTAL MODEL
  3. ASSUMPTIONS
  4. DECISION LOGIC
  5. BEHAVIOR

The method moves in both directions between neighboring levels.

Multi-hypothesis reconstruction

One observation opens several explanations. The system keeps competing interpretations side by side and compares each with the evidence.

Observed Action
H1H2H3
Evidence comparison
Contradictions
Updated confidence
Illustration without measured values.

Narrative coherence does not count as evidence.

Theory of Mind and artificial systems

Theory of Mind and artificial systems

This research space connects EIL to work on:

  • Theory of Mind
  • mental-model reconstruction
  • perspective taking
  • social cognition
  • behavioral inference
  • cognitive modeling
  • computational psychology
  • human-AI collaborative reasoning

The topic list names neighboring fields. No results exist, the program is exploratory and in preparation.

Can an intelligent system construct useful models of the external world and of other intelligent systems operating inside it?

Any system that has to interact with humans or other agents needs this.

From World Models to Models of Minds

EIL's world-model research therefore has a second possible layer. An intelligent system may need both a model of the world and models of the agents within that world.

World model and actor model stay separate levels.

DINGIR works on the world-model layer (world state). The actor layer is the subject of this program and in preparation.

Epistemic boundary

This research space requires an especially strict epistemic separation. The system distinguishes five levels:

  1. ObservedDirectly documented behavior or language.
  2. DerivedLogically reconstructed from evidence.
  3. InferredA plausible interpretation.
  4. HypothesisOne possible explanation.
  5. UnknownInformation that cannot currently be determined.

Test outcome

ContradictedWhen other evidence contradicts a statement, it stays in the record as "contradicted".

The scientifically defensible objective is: the system constructs and continuously tests competing models of how another person may be interpreting the situation.

Excluded: knowledge of what another person thinks.

Long-term direction

  1. human-AI reasoning
  2. cognitive reconstruction
  3. computational Theory of Mind
  4. multi-agent perspective modeling
  5. adaptive intelligence systems
A direction, no results yet.

Systems that cooperate need to represent their own state and the environment, and also the likely informational and cognitive states of the other actors.

Cognitive reconstruction is part of the larger EIL question of how intelligence models other intelligence. The associated study is a paper of its own beside the core paper and is in preparation.

Back to the page of space D →